AT has an outstanding uptime record, aside from the recent memory problem. You can even go to a separate mirror site if you have problems at the main site. All you'll miss out on are strange comments...
That's what wiki does say, on a general approach that is. Now if you just think - would a gov. monitor a site on tor links only, no it wouldn't. Http(s) is way easier. But Tor is way harder, act. both but if one would be compromised ... If you rly think this site is not being monitored at some state ... happy ponies! I think the only question is about the capabilities of the servers.
Yeah, few days. Just THINK for once. That 200 post back then has been acknowledged way back. There has been many post each day with dropouts between. Do you think it did work half a year and then in between hours the same amount was set?
I rly, rly, rly do hope you just wanted to make a very! lame! old! joke! But seeing comments these days and how rid. such a joke might be - you're pob. another example of: "I know there is an x an c, but in the end, I can not read at all"
Wikipedia also says 'The NSA (US Government investigators) targets Tor users...for close monitoring...'. --not a good thing for a place like AT if true.
So what's the positive in making efforts to improving access for troublemakers and what risks are worthwhile for AT and why?
Welcome. As I recall your color scheme selection is stored in cookies and should remain the same for you unless you delete or don't use cookies. No reason to impose one person's preferences on others. The numbers refer to year and quarter, the default scheme being the current ones.
Interesting note (to me, anyway) -- every time AT was 502'd I could still see the about page.That was with cleared browser cache and browsers rarely used.
Tor: I'm not sure it would be wise to encourage tor here with a link. In my experience, these have often been the people who have behaved badly enough at sites to be banned and tor is their only way back. More bullies than civil libertarians, sadly.
I do read someone claiming to be who he is not and likes to insults others. The only facts known: "There have been many errors the past few days." On gateway 502 search page 308,307, ... read between lines .... it's common. Now this is a more genetic answer. So you act. can't know the real cause (for some1 external). HOW can you know what caused these problems? You can't, just some nap thinking to now everything. Just to let you know: I've tried act. several VPN % DNS Servers. Now attacks here are just temporary, but a tor link is likely to stay active.
And could like anybody stop doing the very wrong assumptions just cause they feel like it? I've seen such behaviour on various sites and it .... rly freaks me out ... how could one just think he guessed it right????
Who said it would? Learn reading, or asking before posting. I am talking about situations where it would be some local isp porblematic routing while it would work for others.
Relating "by default", I somewhat agree. But that doesn't any matter, If someone cares. I've never recognized a behavior or seen a serious report, that any data is sent, when switch and/or endpoint url is/are disabled in about:config. Those who don't want to mess around with details, can go with some well known config like: https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/
That telemetry data is used to enhance the browser only. You can take a look into what kind of data is collected, I don't think that will serve any paid services. Also you don't need to compile it yourself. There are many forks around without telemetry but other optimizations depending on your needs (like if you still need xul compat.)
"compile your own browser" isn't very realistic, hence FF is all their is.
It's been a while but when I last worked with Chrome I couldn't find any of the kind of extensions for protecting personal data that I could get for FF. It was like a category that didn't exist.
Google is taking heat from governments for ads and personal data. Firefox is not.
Kametsu couldn't have prepared "for the worst" due to when/how he established the site. Short version is he was basically a kid and had already linked too much to his real, traceable ID. Gotta feel for him, nobody saw this kind of thing coming years ago when he started it all.
All that said, if I was a member there I'd ask one thing: do the "friendly talks" and "cease fire" with the entities that issued dmca mean that member info was sold out as part of the bargain?
But i hope the "official cease-fire" and "friendly" talks, even after the board was brought online to ensure things are good on both sides and and anything we possibly missed in our initial sweeps are being flagged/reported directly to us to handle by removal rather than additional DMCA's issued. So I want to ensure what we do going forward isn't going to sour that relation."
Firefox by default collects plenty of telemetry data. Don't be naive, everyone is in the data business now. Being non-profit is a tax shelter, not a zero money business. Nothing is free, you are the product. Only way to stop these companies is to cherry-pick open source code and compile your own browser.
12/02/2019 01:42 — Anonymous