Thanks for the suggestion!
A concern I have is that many commenters may not bother to set a type (though the link posters most likely all would), so I haven't added many types.

I'm going to keep the homepage list the same as before, and make the comments listing page filterable.

AnonFIles can be as much as 10 times faster than other hosts.  I would not mind to re-download a file if it is corrupted.

I confirm, I just downloaded 6-7 files and all of them were extracted successfully

Recent files that are downloaded from AF seems to be fine. No problems with corruption or CRC. Please keep using them. =P

Please could you a filter on the pop-up menu so people can browse the large BD rips of series/movies/etc  that have been skipped and have been greyed out .

They are added in whatever gets submitted onto Nyaa's and Tokyotosho in the anime section get's mirrored here maybe your not properly looking right.

dude the site is awesome but i hav a complain y don't u upload kousei fansub one piece episode please add them if possible

Cannot answer that as I'm not sitting at your end. However, Anonfiles and Peejeshare do not have restrictions on the number if connections per file you have with them.

*how much

So how much you have to redownload to fix it usually?

I guess, depending on how you have to redownload from the torrent (hopefully not much), but with Anonfiles in can easily get a 500mb anime in under 5mins, it's that fast

But we could easily fix it with torrent. =P

I may reconsider, but I don't really like uploading to a service that's likely to corrupt things :/
Despite the note on the top of the front page, written in nice small font so that it's easily missed, there will be those that try the links only to get a corrupt file, which can be frustrating.
There are others that don't seem to mind the corrupt files.

I suppose it depends on whether they improve or not.

They're working much better than when I disabled them, but yes, I am still getting empty replies relatively often still.

Love the ideas!
Yeah, it's mostly a fun page to be quite honest. It relies entirely on the script's ability to automatically determine the correct episode of a file, which at times gets things horribly wrong.

1. There can be quite a number of images on the page, so I don't really want to make them too big. Enlarge-able images are possible, I can't think of a way to do it though (any ideas?).
2. I like this idea. A problem would be trying to figure out which file to take the screenshot from... Logically, it should be the first file received (otherwise we don't have an image to display on that page when the entry gets created), and possibly the middle screenshot?
3. This sounds interesting, but I'm a bit lost on how to design this - any design suggestions?

1. Someone suggested a listing of shows (instead of episodes) on the last feedback page - I think this is probably more relevant for sorting purposes. Though sorting by latest files is probably still going to be a major thing. The problem is that links die fast, so having a nice list of dead links may not be that useful...
2/3. Sites like AniDB, ANN, MAL etc do sorting much better than I'd ever do it here, so I'd recommend looking there for recommendations

Each time you download the same file, do you actually get the same file back from AnonFiles?
From my quick tests, I actually seem to be getting different files (different hashes).

To check, you can use something like HashTab (on Windows) - check that the hashes of each file to see if they are the same.

Yeah, it could be an upload problem, but that's difficult to determine if downloads are actually being modified unfortunately. Thanks for your input nonetheless.

I'll have to think a bit about whether it can be particularly beneficial. Generating these files would mean that they have to be uploaded. In which case, we may as well upload the whole file.
I see your point in being easier to store, although I find the main issue being time-outs on hosts. You may be able to store a few files on an account, but once you start taking up lots of space, the host will probably start looking at culling files. A 5% redundancy, of, say, 50GB/day, is 2.5GB/day, which still builds up over time unfortunately.

The way 7zipping is currently done, each byte is dependent on the previous one, so a bit flip will propagate throughout the rest of the file.

TCP over IPv6 is checksumed according to Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmiss...m_for_IPv6

Thanks again for the idea though, you've got some interesting points.

hi
can anybody tell me which host is'nt have speed limit????

It is due to poor servers on AF side because no-one  uses them and they will time-out your downloads due to poor bandwith.Try BU,ZU,SB,180up,etc instead of them.

Please don't remove Anonfile. They did give me a bad file once, but the download is so fast it doesn't matter. On JDownloader it can have has many connection as it wants, making the speed as high as 1-2mb/s at school. I download a lot at school because of the terrible bandwidth limit I have at home. There's not a lot of hosts with amazing speeds or no limits

So admin, I notice you started using peeje again.... Just curious if you're having trouble with them still?

A lot of people have difficulty extracting from AF, this is from their end.
You either have to redownload or use a torrent (to fix/repair the file)

self-selected categories would probably be the best, unless if you want to just separate links from replies then it could be automated.
The first thing that came to mind would be  to use a tab-like layout for the latest comment section so the homepage doesn't get cluttered.

Whenever I try to unpack anything downloaded from AnonFiles I get an error. Anyone else?

hi
is there a site like peejeshare to allow us download with direct link????
its seem's you are dont upload in peejeshare anymore :((

About benefit, I would say it is not that "much". It's also NOT necessary if corruption doesn't happen. It's just a kind of "smart" backup, and "redundant".

I'm not sure about what you mean about "delta coding" with 7z. Correct me if I'm wrong. In my opinion, a random bit flip is a flip of a cuple of local bit, not some bits disappear or are added, so it can be fixed with a redundancy block.

PAR is not copyrighted, so it's a bit easier to store. I usually use Ge.tt
BTW, IIRC TCP in IPv6 is not checksummed.

Latest Comment listings on the homepage: We've probably come to a point where the latest comments should be divided out/sorted a bit.  For example, into categories such as:

1. Download links (Thanks Yogicat, Tibbs and everyone, by the way.)
2. Tech help
3. Info on show (Not airing this week, Recap episode, etc.)
4. Opinions
5. Other

Currently the download link comments scroll the other stuff off the homepage screen pretty fast.  That may keep a welcome peace as far as opinions go (just another opinion), but tech help needs are probably getting lost.

Self-selected should be adequate.

Don't know how this can be done without using up too much homepage space, offhand.

I forgot to mention --some additional sorting options would be nice.  Right now it sorts by time of arrival I guess.
1. Alphabetical sort --to find specific programs of interest
2. Popularity sort -number of downloads for ideas of what to try and see who we are (if 90% of our downloads turn out to be Pokemon...)
3. Genre sort --to find drama, comedy, younger audience, school settings, etc.  Maybe via admin's look-up links to AniDb, etc.

Those last two sorts might be difficult?

admin's "experimental episodes listing" link has scrolled out of sight and I guess disappears with his next system message.  Will there be a permanent button or something on the homepage to get there?  It's a great way to see what the latest episode is.

Difficult but fun:
1. A picture that is big enough to see and can be enlarged
2. A picture from the actual episode, not just one standard shot
3. How about the whole row of preview pictures that can be clicked on and enlarged for each title, as it is on the file's download page?

Anyways, thank!

AnonFiles: My experiences are not in line with other reports in one respect: Whenever I encounter a "broken file", every re-try resulted in another broken file.  Based on my experiences, I would assume the problem, whatever it is, is happening at the upload phase, not the download.

I assume others are looking into this problem in more detail, but I thought I would mention this.

I continue to get a strangely consistent 30% failure rate, like today: 14/21 successes.

I upload anonymously, and never created an account, so I had no idea what was going on :P

I'll post a reply if I noticed that they changed something again.

Thanks for the suggestion!

PAR sounds like it could be useful.
My main wonder is, though, how necessary is it really? TCP is checksummed, so it should be able to detect transmission errors - corruption seems somewhat unlikely here.
Okay, AnonFiles is problematic, although they're a relatively rare case. Unfortunately as I'm using delta coding, a random bit flip will corrupt the rest of the file, so some redundancy probably won't be enough to fix it.
Even with the rare case of corruption, you could fix it via the torrent, as long as it still has peers. Torrents hash pieces, so it will be able to identify which pieces are bad and re-download good copies of these. PAR files, on the other hand, just seem to increase your chances of getting a good file, and may not work depending on how much corruption there is.

Another complexity factor is where to upload the PAR files to.
Is there much of a benefit with PAR files?

Never thought that I'd receive this long reply ._.
I mean when I wake up I receive a email from support@peejeshare said that they are running Upgrades/maintenance, and the servers will be much better, and make promises that there aren't any "File Temporarily Unavailable Errors" and "All Download Slots Full Errors" and "All of the files in your file manager actually exist"
I thought all have PJS accounts including you have received the email, and aware of this good news.
So sorry of that damn statement, and me too hope admin will reconsider PJS, give them one more chance xD
Again but never enough, thank you.

I try my best to upload there, but it's hard with my schedule sometimes. I would like to offer a link for each file, but it's a bit unrealistic. :-(

On a side note I should mention some things (that I keep on prolonging to bring up).

Since I was able to upload to peejeshare again starting yesterday, I noticed some unique changes.
Foremost, I'm not getting any upload failures. As long as my connection doesn't reset (from my end) the upload will complete.
I have yet to see "all connections for the file is filled, please try again momentarily" (you know the message, right?) for all the links I uploaded and checked, the only issue is the "page not found" (which I think is correlated with the names of the files). But these advancements have some significant costs.
I can only upload 5 files simultaneously, which further lengths the time to take.
Now, You would think I would be able to upload faster with the limit but, in fact it's not. Before peejeshare (if successful) would take considerable less time (less guess around 5-15min and with 7+ simultaneous uploads --- err well I would probably have to do 2 (sometimes more) tries before succeeding) but, now each file I upload easily takes 20+ minutes to complete. PJ will mess with their setup again so I don't know if it will be permanent.

TL;DR: + no upload failures
+ should be able to download without waiting for a dl link.
- max 5 simultaneous uploads
- longer uploads times

Lastly I'm considering uploading to putlocker. I notice that multiupload (for bigger files) isn't really uploading there, would anyone want me to do that?
I should point out this ---> http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/154467 which will allow you download the different versions of the video on PL. (who knows how long it will last before PL patches it)


But maybe admin will reconsider peeje as there seems (to me) to be no failures.

Now, this is a lengthy response to a damn statement, which a part of me feels that this should not of been a reply. (<_<)

Hope to see PeejeShare come back.

Akafile gave me ~50KB/s while Anonfiles gave me ~1.5MB/s.
I tested with an Australia VPS. (Akafile doesn't allow my country to download actually)

Hi admin, it would be wonderful if you considered providing PAR2 for uploaded files. It's a great way to fix random damages of data when transferring over internet.

Parchive (a contraction of parity archive volume set) is an erasure code system that uses a parity file format. These parity files are used to perform checksum verification, and can also repair corrupted or missing data. Parchive was originally written to solve the problem of reliably transferring files on Usenet,[1] but it is now commonly used for protecting any kind of data from data corruption, bit rot, and accidental or malicious damage. (copied from Wikipedia)

Here is the test PAR2 for [IB] Mondaiji-tachi ga Isekai kara Kuru Sou Desu yo - 05 [720p] [10bit] [D1705E86].mkv ~~>> http://ge.tt/7BgxLSY/v/0
Program for repairing using PAR2 files (and create them): MultiPar http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA021385/
(5% redundancy - can used to fix the file if damage is 5% or less)

(PAR2 is widely used in Usenet where random data corruption happens all time. It would take some computing resources, though.)

I too would like to see AkaFile being used as a mirror.

Uploaded a file for testing purposes:
http://akafile.com/pppphh35a5n1
Filename:[IB] Wooser no Sonohi Gurashi - 01v2 [720p] [10bit] [7DE32963].mkv
Size:56.0 MB

Thanks :)

Thanks for the heads up.  As for quitting AnonFiles, I'm getting a 2/3rds success rate for files at a superfast delivery rate of up to 3MB/sec.  That might be a good enough trade-off for me.  Then I can pick up the failures by other means.  And they have to fix this sooner or later if they plan to exist...

And thanks for everything.

Looks like downloading the files with Jdownloader isn't giving any problems unlike IDM for some reason the files want to get corrupted.

you could replace anon with akafile.com , good speed no captcha and so on

Untested, but done.

You're right, I didn't get around to it last time because I ran out of time trying to see why it was failing.
Thanks for the suggestion.

I'm still quite sceptical over this.
Delta coding is very simple and it's unlikely there's any bug with the code for it.
Considering that the errors are occurring because of random bit flips, I can't see how any version of 7-Zip could fix this as there's absolutely no redundancy information in the file.

My bet is that you just happened to get a working file once you performed the re-download. The version of 7-Zip should have no effect.
(or maybe you got a bit flip exactly in a non-essential part of header/footer of the file on your first try, but you'd have to have been very lucky for this to occur!)
But I'll wait to hear from others to see if they experience the same. Thanks for the info nonetheless!

The site above seemed to be using it well for over a week, considering how much files and how large the files are, i suspect they are uploading anonymously. The sample download link also did not require a password or key to download.
The download speed is very fast and it is simple to download without waiting time or captchas.
Just thought admin might be interested to look into it.

Given the failure rate at AnonFiles, isn't it time for a note on the AT homepage to warn those who are prudent and read admin's notes and to shove up the noses of those who don't then complain?

7z lists version 9.25 as alpha-ware.  It lists 9.22 as beta-ware.  Neither should be recommended to a general audience.  I've done alpha-ware with Microsoft.  Scary, drive-crashing, board-burning stuff.

9.20 is still listed as the stable release.

I understand there is a 50GB limit per account at Mega?  You'd be surprised how fast that gets used up.  Didn't admin drop mediafire for a similar limit?

Also, I understand that all files at Mega are encrypted and require a password to access.  Just to mention that complication as well.